Maja Bucan of the University of Pennsylvania argued for incorporating sleep phenotypes in genetic studies with wrist-worn devices. She and colleagues have developed a cohort of people with ASD without intellectual disability, as well as their family members. Designed as a genetic study, the cohort has several domains of phenotypic information collected, including sleep data captured by an actimetry wristwatch-like device, which not only captures motion, but also temperature and ambient light in the home (GENEActiv). A pilot study of nearly 400 people has found some significant differences in sleep measures in those with ASD and their unaffected relatives, as well as some correlations between sleep parameters and measures of social difficulties and executive function. The actimetry data, analyzed by ChronoSapiens software, can also detect cycles of locomotor inactivity during sleep (LIDS) that correspond to cycles of REM and non-REM sleep. Eventually, sleep phenotypes will be integrated with genomic analysis of known circadian genes or genetic loci associated with autism.
Approaches to studying sleep in other conditions, such as dementia, can inform methods for ASD, said Derk-Jan Dijk of the University of Surrey. To begin to validate sleep measurement methods in dementia, Dijk and colleagues have tested multiple technologies to monitor sleep in the home in cognitively-healthy older people. This showed reasonable agreement between data collected in the home from an EEG headband to EEG signals collected in the lab using gold-standard PSG methodology. In contrast, data from a mattress sensor did not correlate with PSG sleep stage measures, yet still provided useful information about when the person was in bed and interruptions of the sleep period. Other approaches focus on combining ambient light information with mathematical models of the circadian system to design individualized light interventions for circadian disruptions, or use of transcriptome biomarkers that can index circadian phase or sleep deprivation from only a few blood samples.
Ilan Dinstein of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev described the National Autism Database of Israel, which is a longitudinal collection of genotype and phenotype data. Sleep measures are among the many collected phenotypes, which include parent report and lab-based PSG data. Sleep sensors that can be used at home may bridge the gap between parent reports and PSG, as well as offer long-term data that can characterize circadian rhythms and sleep homeostasis. For this, Dinstein’s team has been experimenting with the Fitbit activity monitor. In college students without ASD, they find some agreement between the Fitbit and PSG on sleep duration and epochs of slow wave sleep or REM. Preliminary results in children with ASD find that most will tolerate a Fitbit taped to their arm for five consecutive nights and that these provide data about night awakening, sleep onset and wakeup times that were mostly matched to parent reports. Incorporating sensors of heart rate, oxygen saturation, breathing and ambient light to activity could provide a more refined and personalized picture of sleep.
A downside of the Fitbit is that the operational algorithms are secret, which prevents researchers from obtaining its raw data. These algorithms may also change with new models, which give researchers even less control. Other devices may offer alternatives, but any device will have to be validated against a standard measure to get a sense of its accuracy, and this validation is likely to be specific to different populations. Because a lack of activity may not always indicate sleep, data from other sensors used simultaneously may be needed to increase accuracy. Another discussant suggested that the field may be too focused on getting readouts of sleep stages and that a simpler measure like heart rate may be sufficient. As researchers spend time validating a plethora of commercially available fitness devices, it could be useful to collaborate with companies to produce a device specifically for sleep research.
Three moderators made comments and guided discussion to help process the many explorations of sleep in ASD. Moderator Federico Bolognani from Axial Therapeutics reiterated the need to define an objective when measuring sleep, understand its feasibility in ASD and validate it against other measures. Andrew Varga of Mount Sinai recommended hypothesis-driven and family-centered approaches and encouraged study of the role of circadian rhythms in sleep disturbances in autism. Emmanuel Mignot of Stanford University noted the challenges in choosing among potential sleep measurement devices, though he acknowledged that a measure of activity as a first screen had value. He also emphasized the need for obtaining raw signal data from the device, as well as context-specific validation.
Even as devices proliferate and databases are established, Dijk suggested that the field still lacked a basic characterization of sleep in ASD and that a survey of sleep patterns by objective and by self- or carer-reported measures could help parse some of the heterogeneity found in the disorder. One approach would be to collect massive amounts of data from wearable technologies, then let deep learning of the data find distinct sleep patterns. An alternative approach would be to collect multiple kinds of sleep data from a targeted group, such as those with PMS, though feasibility would be an issue.
In contemplating future clinical trials of sleep interventions, Chris Winrow of Cyclerion stressed the importance of keeping subjective measures of sleep alongside the newer objective measures. This is because regulators want to see that a treatment produces improvements in sleep or quality of life, not just a change in a sleep biomarker. Mignot echoed this, saying that a wearable measure is useless without a clinical feature of sleep alongside it, preferably a validated patient-reported outcome measure, though there may be a need for designing a new tool. Others added that the subjective experience of sleep, and how people feel while awake, could also be useful indicators.
In closing, SFARI’s interim director John Spiro welcomed the community’s continued input about how to use SFARI cohorts to address some of these questions, as well as how SFARI itself could help promote sleep studies in ASD. “Obviously this is just the beginning of a long conversation,” he said.