Still, some students understandably left for programs abroad, and others volunteered for the army. The departure of so many early-career scientists, if permanent, could seriously compromise the future of science in Ukraine. The Simons Foundation wanted to provide support for those scientists who remained. “Ukraine traditionally has outstanding scientists and scientific infrastructure,” says Greg Gabadadze, senior vice president of the Mathematics & Physical Sciences division at the Simons Foundation. “It is of paramount importance to preserve continuity in training the younger generation of scientists in Ukraine.”
The funding, provided by the Simons Foundation and SFI and administered by the Simons Foundation, comes at a time when finding in-country support for Ukrainian research has become exceptionally challenging, Dmytriv says. While national grants have been sustained, many local funding sources diverted their money to the war effort. Dmytriv lost a local grant studying biodegradable plastic — though he and his department have had some success in writing grants with a defense focus, such as exploring how to make ultralight armor or better batteries.
Brizhik had a related experience: Two colleagues got funding from the Ukrainian government for fundamental research, but she did not. “There are not so many [sources of] funding to support Ukrainian scientists who work in Ukraine,” she says. Most are offers to go abroad.
Funding Research, Funding Hope
Supporting scientists like Dmytriv and Brizhik was precisely what the Simons Foundation aimed to do when it launched its grant program. However, identifying who might be eligible for the grants was no easy task. Gabadadze worked with other Simons Foundation staff scientists to identify and reach out to productive labs and research groups still in Ukraine.
One of the foundation scientists tapped to help was Stas Shvartsman, a senior research scientist at the Center for Computational Biology at the Simons Foundation’s Flatiron Institute. Shvartsman grew up in Odesa, a city on Ukraine’s Black Sea coast, when Ukraine was still part of the Soviet Union. His interest in chemistry sent him away for graduate school, first to Moscow, then to Israel and then to the United States. He didn’t feel particularly Ukrainian at that time, he recalls.
But when the attacks on Ukraine came in 2022, he felt them deeply. “Probably for the first time in my life, I didn’t feel like [a] Jewish boy from Odesa that just happened to speak Ukrainian, but I felt Ukrainian identity as somebody who grew up there,” he says. “You feel, of course, very helpless, and there is really not much to do.”
Shvartsman was eager to assist in identifying those top scientists still in Ukraine. He reached out to former classmates and, through them, found the right contacts. “I identified people in Lviv, in Chernivtsi, in Kyiv, and I started talking to them over Zoom,” he says.
The practicing, publishing researchers in Ukraine whom Shvartsman and his colleagues found through their networks were sent brief individual requests for proposals for grants. In the end, more than 430 scientists applied. “We reviewed all the proposals and accepted all of them,” Gabadadze says. The funding is ongoing and has been provided to researchers in fields from astrophysics to biology to pure mathematics.
Brizhik and her colleagues were initially wary when they received the email asking them to apply for funding. At first, she recalls, they thought it was spam. But in the end, they took a chance and applied. Brizhik has used some of the funds to pay for internet access, a memory stick for her research, and some power banks, which she keeps with her important documents in case of evacuation. She also got a large thermos for hot water, which is critical when power and water are so uncertain. In her department, 37 scientists and five doctoral students receive grants from the Simons Foundation and SFI. In Dmytriv’s department, 51 scientists and seven doctoral students receive support.