Machine Learning at the Flatiron Institute Seminar: David Hogg

Date & Time

Title: Is good machine learning bad for science?

Abstract: ML is now baked into many scientific projects. I give two example contexts in which even very well-trained, very high-performance machine-learning methods can bias or compromise scientific projects. In one, a down-stream user of the output of a discriminative classification or regression will generally find that their scientific results are strongly (sometimes catastrophically) biased. This is not because the discriminative method is wrong; it is because it outputs posterior properties, usually with a prior that cannot be removed or accounted for. In another, a project that makes use of an emulator to speed computations will be faced with a verification problem that is either impossible to execute or else strongly confirmation-biased. There may be technical solutions to both of these problems; I will state the open questions as precisely as I can.

May 2, 2023

David Hogg: Is good machine learning bad for science?

Video Thumbnail

By clicking to watch this video, you agree to our privacy policy.

Advancing Research in Basic Science and MathematicsSubscribe to Flatiron Institute announcements and other foundation updates